Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200

Shimano FX
Spinning
46.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.25 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight225g / 7.94oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €18.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000 FC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140
Conclusion
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X clearly outshines Shimano FX 1000 FCX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch). While Shimano FX 1000 FCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Ocea Conquest HG and Shimano FX?
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
- A line retrieval (per crank) of 78 centimeter / 30.71 inch helps bringing in line quickly, making it great for repositioning or working topwater baits
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Shimano FX 1000 FCX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- A bearing score of 5 out of 10 (3) gets the job done (basic but dependable) especially for beginners or casual anglers
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Shimano Stradic SWB 8000PGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Daiwa 23 Saltiga 5000-HX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 10000 PGX


Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 10000 PGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 XGX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 8000-PX


Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 5000-HX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Shimano Stradic SWB 8000PGX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 10000-HX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 8000-PX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-XHX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 10000-HX vs Shimano TLD 15X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X
