Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200

Shimano FX
Spinning
49.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €18.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 FC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X clearly outshines Shimano FX 4000 FCX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (285g / 10,05oz). While Shimano FX 4000 FCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Ocea Conquest HG and Shimano FX?
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
- With a weight score of 9.19 out of 10 (285g / 10,05oz), this reel is impressively light for saltwater and provides great comfort
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Shimano FX 4000 FCX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- A bearing score of 5 out of 10 (3) gets the job done (basic but dependable) especially for beginners or casual anglers
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 10000-HX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 8000-PX vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 8000-PX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 XGX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-XHX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Delphin ELIXIR 5000X


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 10000-HX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 8000-PX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-XHX vs Shimano TLD 20X


Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-XHX vs Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P


Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 10000-HX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 10000-HX


Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
