Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
78.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX edges out Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.2:1) and the maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs). Still, Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10 and a weight of 285g / 10,05oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Ocea Conquest HG and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Spheros SW SP3000XGSWX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Shimano Spheros SW A 14000 XGX


Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Shimano Spheros SW SP3000XGSWX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 10000 PGX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000PGX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 8000-PX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 18000 HGX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 XGX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Shimano Spheros SW A 14000 XGX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 8000-PX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Shimano Spheros SW SPC3000HGSWX


Shimano Stradic SWB 4000XGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 18000 HGX
