Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Both Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X and Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X offers a line retrieve per crank of 78 centimeter / 30.71 inch, while Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X stands out for a ball bearings of 4+1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Ocea Conquest HG and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Beastmaster 12000 MD


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Shimano Spheros SW SPC3000HGSWX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 6000 HGX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-HX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 XGX


Shimano Stradic SWB 8000HGX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Shimano Stradic SWB 8000HGX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-HX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-HX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 10000 PGX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Shimano Stradic SWB 8000HGX vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-HX


Shimano Spheros SW SPC3000HGSWX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-PX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 XGX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-PX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X
