Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
55.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140
Conclusion
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X edges out Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch) and the durability (9.5 out of 10). Still, Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 3+1 and a gear ratio of 5.0:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Ocea Conquest HG and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
- A line retrieval (per crank) of 78 centimeter / 30.71 inch helps bringing in line quickly, making it great for repositioning or working topwater baits
Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Daiwa BG MQ 20000X vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa BG MQ 20000X


Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-XHX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 8000 HGX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-HX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-HX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW 6000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW 6000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-HX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 8000 HGX


Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-HX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Daiwa BG MQ 20000X vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-XHX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 PGX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-HX
