Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
63.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Both Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X and Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X offers a line retrieve per crank of 78 centimeter / 30.71 inch, while Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX stands out for a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Ocea Conquest HG and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa BG MQ 20000X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 XGX


Daiwa BG MQ 2500-HX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Shimano Stradic FM vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-PX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa BG MQ 20000X


Daiwa BG MQ 20000X vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Daiwa BG MQ 2500-HX


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-XHX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Daiwa BG MQ 20000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-XHX vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Stradic FM


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-XHX vs Shimano Stradic FM


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 XGX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-XHX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa BG MQ 2500-HX


Daiwa BG MQ 20000X vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-XHX
