Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
63.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Both Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X and Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X offers a line retrieve per crank of 78 centimeter / 30.71 inch, while Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX stands out for a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Ocea Conquest HG and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 PGX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 PGX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-XHX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 PGX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-PX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-XHX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa BG MQ 3000D-XHX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Shimano Spheros SW A 14000 XGX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 PGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX


Shimano Spheros SW A 14000 XGX vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-PX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-XHX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 PGX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-XHX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-PX


Shimano Spheros SW A 18000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-XHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX
