Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Shimano Sienna 1000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200

Shimano Sienna
Spinning
49.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.25 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight225g / 7.94oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €27.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140
Conclusion
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X clearly outshines Shimano Sienna 1000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch). While Shimano Sienna 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Ocea Conquest HG and Shimano Sienna?
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
- A line retrieval (per crank) of 78 centimeter / 30.71 inch helps bringing in line quickly, making it great for repositioning or working topwater baits
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Shimano Sienna 1000X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 Saltiga 4000-HX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX


Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 6000XGX


Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 4000-HX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 HGX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-HX


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-HX vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-HX


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000XGX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 18000-HX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-HX


Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 18000-HX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 18000-HX


Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-HX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 HGX


Shimano TLD 15X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano TLD 15X vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 18000-HX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-HX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX
