Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG

Seafishing

201x

66.70 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability9.5 out of 10

Ergonomics5.99 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs

Weight285g / 10.05oz

Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch

Ball bearings11

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSeafishing
Price range~ €477.10
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size201
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeStar drag
Handle orientationLeft
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200

Shimano Twin Power XD A

Spinning

82.90 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability9.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.33 out of 10

Gear ratio6.4:1

Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs

Weight200g / 7.05oz

Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch

Ball bearings11

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €359.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel sizeC 3000 XG
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210

Conclusion

Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX edges out Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and the total score (8.29 out of 10). Still, Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X holds its own with strengths like a weight of 285g / 10,05oz and a durability of 9.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Shimano Ocea Conquest HG and Shimano Twin Power XD A?

Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX

With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt