Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
92.50 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €132.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000HGD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX clearly outshines Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.8:1) and ball bearings (6). While Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Ocea Conquest HG and Shimano Ultegra?
Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-HX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000XGX vs Shimano Spheros SW SP3000XGSWX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 8000-HX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 4000-XHX vs Shimano TLD 20X


Shimano TLD 20X vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-XHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX


Shimano TLD 20X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Spheros SW SP3000XGSWX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 8000-HX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX vs Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW 6000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-HX


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000XGX vs Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R
