Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200

Shimano Sahara 4000 R
Spinning
42.30 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3 kg / 6.61 lbs
Weight335g / 11.82oz
Line retireve per crank82cm / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €50.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/260. 0.30/180, 0.35/130
Conclusion
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 4000 R, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (285g / 10,05oz). While Shimano Sahara 4000 R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Ocea Conquest HG and Shimano Sahara 4000 R?
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
- With a weight score of 9.19 out of 10 (285g / 10,05oz), this reel is impressively light for saltwater and provides great comfort
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Shimano Sahara 4000 R
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3 kg / 6.61 lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 HGX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Shimano Stradic SWB 10000HGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-XHX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 6000D-HX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 6000D-HX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 10000-PX


Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 10000-PX


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 6000D-HX


Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-XHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 10000HGX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 25000X vs Penn Battle III 2000X
