Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200

Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI
Spinning
63.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82 lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank91cm / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 HG FI
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160 lb/yds: 6/200, 8/140, 10/120
Conclusion
Both Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X and Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Ocea Conquest HG and Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI?
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8.82 lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 18000-HX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000XGX vs Daiwa BG MQ 2500-HX


Shimano Stradic SWB 8000HGX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa BG MQ 2500-HX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 XGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 PGX


Daiwa BG MQ 2500-HX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 HGX


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 18000-HX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 PGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX


Daiwa BG MQ 2500-HX vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 8000HGX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 PGX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 5000XGX


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Shimano Stradic SWB 8000HGX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Daiwa BG MQ 2500-HX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Stradic SWB 8000HGX


Shimano Stradic SWB 8000HGX vs Shimano TLD 15X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
