Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200

Shimano Sedona 500 FI
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag3kg / 7 lbs
Weight180g / 6.3oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60
Conclusion
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X edges out Shimano Sedona 500 FI with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch). Still, Shimano Sedona 500 FI holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 5.6:1 and a ball bearings of 3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Ocea Conquest HG and Shimano Sedona 500 FI?
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
- A line retrieval (per crank) of 78 centimeter / 30.71 inch helps bringing in line quickly, making it great for repositioning or working topwater baits
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Shimano Sedona 500 FI
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.8 out of 10 (5.6:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 7 lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 HGX vs Shimano TLD 20X


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 4000 XGX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 10000HGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 PGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano TLD 20X


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 8000PGX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Shimano Stradic SWB 8000PGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano Spheros SW A 8000 HGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Shimano Spheros SW A 8000 HGX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Shimano Spheros SW A 8000 HGX


Shimano Stradic SWB 8000PGX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Spheros SW A 18000 HGX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Shimano Spheros SW A 18000 HGX


Shimano TLD 20X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Shimano Stradic SWB 8000PGX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 18000 HGX
