Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200

Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
Spinning
58.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.97 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61oz
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank79cm / 31.10 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €48.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000 HGS
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.14mm-145m / 0.16mm-105m/0.18mm-80m
Conclusion
Both Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X and Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI stands out for a gear ratio of 6.0:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Ocea Conquest HG and Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI?
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
- A fast gear ratio of 9.6 out of 10 (6.0:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6.61oz), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 18000 HGX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 5000 XGX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 18000 HGX


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 8000-HX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Spheros SW A 18000 HGX


Shimano Beastmaster 12000 MD vs Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 4000-XHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 8000-HX vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 25000X vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Spheros SW A 18000 HGX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 25000X


Shimano Beastmaster 12000 MD vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Shimano Beastmaster 12000 MD vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 8000-HX


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 4000-XHX vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 8000-HX


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Daiwa BG MQ 3000D-XHX


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Delphin HORNET 40X
