Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200

Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
Spinning
68.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84 lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank91cm / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000 HG
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/210. 0.30/130, 0.35/100 lb/yds: 6/230, 8/170, 10/140
Conclusion
Both Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X and Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Ocea Conquest HG and Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI?
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19.84 lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 Certate SW 18000-HX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 8000-PX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 4000 XGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 8000-PX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 8000-PX vs Shimano Spheros SW SPC3000HGSWX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 8000-HX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 18000-HX vs Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 20000-HX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 8000-PX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 20000-HX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-HX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 18000-HX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa BG MQ 2500-HX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 20000-HX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX
