Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ocea Jigger
Multireels
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.81 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag9.9kg / 21,83lbs
Weight595g / 20.99oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €453.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 NR PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.61/310

Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
18.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.6:1
Maximum drag-
Weight630g / 22.22oz
Line retireve per crank99cm / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.35mm/370m
Conclusion
Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in total score (9.5 out of 10) and ball bearings (9). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Ocea Jigger and Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX
- Higher gear ratio of 5.1:1 (scoring 9.2 out of 10), provides more speed meaning a better solution when quick retrieves really count
- At a maximum drag of 9,9kg / 21,83lbs (scoring 5.51 out of 10), the reel has a modest drag setup which is enough for smaller fish or relaxed situations where finesse matters more
- Scoring 8.02 out of 10 (595g / 20,99oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.5 out of 10 (9), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa BG 3000X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II
