Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ocea Jigger
Multireels
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.81 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag9.9kg / 21,83lbs
Weight595g / 20.99oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €453.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 NR PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.61/310

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280
Conclusion
Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX clearly outshines Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (9) and gear ratio (5.1:1). While Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Ocea Jigger and Penn 2020 Clash II?
Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX
- Higher gear ratio of 5.1:1 (scoring 9.2 out of 10), provides more speed meaning a better solution when quick retrieves really count
- Scoring 8.02 out of 10 (595g / 20,99oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.07 out of 10 (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.5 out of 10 (9), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X
