Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ocea Jigger
Multireels
90.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag18kg / 39.68lbs
Weight791g / 27.9oz
Line retireve per crank117 centimeter / 46.06 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €509.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.8/494

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.30 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX offers a ball bearings of 7, while Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Ocea Jigger and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
- Rated 8.29 out of 10 (300g / 10,58oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Delphin RAYA body vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX
