Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ocea Jigger
Multireels
90.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag18kg / 39.68lbs
Weight791g / 27.9oz
Line retireve per crank117 centimeter / 46.06 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €509.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.8/494

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX offers a gear ratio of 5.1:1, while Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Ocea Jigger and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX
