Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.
Shimano Ocea Jigger
Multireels
90.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag18kg / 39.68lbs
Weight791g / 27.9oz
Line retireve per crank117 centimeter / 46.06 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €509.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.8/494
Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €673.66
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX and Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX offers a ball bearings of 7, while Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX stands out for a weight of 175g / 6,17oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Ocea Jigger and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons
Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX
Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX
Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX
Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX
Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X
Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF
Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX
Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X
Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX
Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX
Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX
Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX
Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX
Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX
Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X
Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X
Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX
Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX