Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ocea Jigger
Multireels
90.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag18kg / 39.68lbs
Weight791g / 27.9oz
Line retireve per crank117 centimeter / 46.06 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €509.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.8/494

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €649.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX and Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX offers a ball bearings of 7, while Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 99 centimeter / 38.98 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Ocea Jigger and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX
- With a score like 8.67 out of 10 (200g / 7,05oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- A high retrieve rate of 9.4 out of 10 (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
Similar comparisons

Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX
