Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ocea Jigger
Multireels
90.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag18kg / 39.68lbs
Weight791g / 27.9oz
Line retireve per crank117 centimeter / 46.06 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €509.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.8/494

Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
Spinning
29.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (18kg / 39,68lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Ocea Jigger and Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R?
Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX
- With a serious drag score of 10 out of 10 (18kg / 39,68lbs), this reel is made to stop big carp in their tracks, even in rough terrain or tight swims
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX
