Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
57.00 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/170

Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity
Spinning
84.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €484.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/200
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) and total score (8.49 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity?
Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX
