Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
57.00 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/170

Daiwa Crossfire LT
Spinning
49.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.86 out of 10
Ergonomics6.03 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €41.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X clearly outshines Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (4+1) and maximum drag (3kg / 6,61lbs). While Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Daiwa Crossfire LT?
Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
