Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
57.00 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/170

Daiwa Crossfire LT
Spinning
52.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.88 out of 10
Ergonomics6.03 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €42.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X and Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X offers a ball bearings of 4+1, while Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 87 centimeter / 34.25 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Daiwa Crossfire LT?
Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Similar comparisons

Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX
