Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
57.00 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/170

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420
Conclusion
Daiwa Tanacom 500 edges out Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (7.04 out of 10). Still, Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X holds its own with strengths like a weight of 205g / 7,23oz and a ball bearings of 4+1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Daiwa Tanacom 500?
Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa Tanacom 500
