Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX

Shimano Sahara FJ

Spinning

57.00 out of 100

Value for money2.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability7 out of 10

Ergonomics6.32 out of 10

Gear ratio5.0:1

Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs

Weight205g / 7.23oz

Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch

Ball bearings4+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €63.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size1000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/170

Penn Battle III Long Cast

Spinning

8000 Lcx

53.60 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.59 out of 10

Ergonomics4 out of 10

Gear ratio4.0:1

Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs

Weight748g / 26.39oz

Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandPENN
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €177.40
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size8000 LC
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485

Conclusion

Both Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X and Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X offers a weight of 205g / 7,23oz, while Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Penn Battle III Long Cast?

Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X

Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.