Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
57.00 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/170

Shimano 21 Nexave FI
Spinning
60.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.91 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank98 centimeter / 38.58 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €44.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/175
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X and Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X offers a weight of 205g / 7,23oz, while Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 98 centimeter / 38.58 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Shimano 21 Nexave FI?
Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX
- A high retrieve rate of 9.3 out of 10 (98 centimeter / 38.58 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX
