Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X and Daiwa Tanacom 500 perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X offers a weight of 240g / 8,47oz, while Daiwa Tanacom 500 stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Daiwa Tanacom 500?
Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX
