Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X and Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X offers a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs, while Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX
