Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X and Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X offers a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs, while Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Delphin YUPIE


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Delphin YUPIE vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Delphin YUPIE


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag
