Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 XGX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C
Seafishing
69.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.8 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs
Weight420g / 14.82oz
Line retireve per crank105 centimeter / 41.34 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €435.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X and Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 XGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X offers a ball bearings of 4+1, while Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 XGX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C?
Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 5000 XGX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-XHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano Spheros SW SP4000XGSWX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 HGX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-XHX


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 PGX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 PGX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-PX


Shimano Spheros SW SP4000XGSWX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 5000 XGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 PGX vs Delphin YUPIE


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Delphin YUPIE
