Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C
Seafishing
74.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight615g / 21.69oz
Line retireve per crank107 centimeter / 42.13 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €429.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/230
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X and Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X offers a ball bearings of 4+1, while Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C?
Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Shimano Spheros SW A 6000 HGX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX


Shimano Spheros SW A 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 PGX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 6000 HGX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Shimano Spheros SW A 6000 HGX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 20000 PGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 PGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 PGX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 20000 PGX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 10000HGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 PGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Stradic SWB 10000HGX


Shimano Spheros SW A 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX
