Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X and Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X offers a ball bearings of 4+1, while Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 78 centimeter / 30.71 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Shimano Ocea Conquest HG?
Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 8000 HGX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 6000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-XHX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 5000XGX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-XHX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-XHX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 PGX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 PGX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Shimano Stradic SWB 5000XGX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 HGX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 6000 HGX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-XHX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-XHX


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-XHX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 8000 HGX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 6000 HGX vs Shimano Spheros SW SP4000XGSWX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-XHX


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Shimano Stradic SWB 5000XGX


Shimano Stradic SWB 5000XGX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 6000 HGX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 XGX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX
