Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Shimano Cardiff 301A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Shimano Cardiff 301A
Multireels
34.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight252g / 8.89oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size301
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/285. 0.30/235, 0.40/40 lb/yds:12/230, 14/180
Conclusion
Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 301A, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and gear ratio (5.0:1). While Shimano Cardiff 301A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Shimano Cardiff 301A?
Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X
