Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX

Shimano Sahara FJ, 4000 XG, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, SH4000XGFJ
Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
78.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings4+1

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €71.33
  • Is saltwater resistantYes
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size4000 XG
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ), 2500-XH, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10426-251
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €163.20
  • Is saltwater resistantYes
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size2500-XH
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX edges out Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the total score (9.5 out of 10) and the durability (8.54 out of 10). Still, Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 99 centimeter / 38.98 inch and a maximum drag of 11kg / 24,25lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?

There are not much differences between the two comparables