Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
78.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280
Conclusion
Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX edges out Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.2:1) and the line retrieve per crank (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch). Still, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Penn 2020 Clash II?
Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.13 out of 10 (280g / 9,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- A high retrieve rate of 9.4 out of 10 (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX
