Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
78.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX
