Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Shimano Beastmaster
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
78.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Shimano Beastmaster
Multireels
81.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1485g / 52.38oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings14
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €1,149.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.52/650
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX and Shimano Beastmaster perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX offers a gear ratio of 6.2:1, while Shimano Beastmaster stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Shimano Beastmaster?
Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.13 out of 10 (280g / 9,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
