Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sahara FJ

Spinning

78.00 out of 100

Value for money3 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability7 out of 10

Ergonomics6.07 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs

Weight280g / 9.88oz

Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch

Ball bearings4+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €71.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000 XG
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Shimano Talica 20II CAM

Multireels

20ii Camx

95.00 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability5.64 out of 10

Ergonomics3.4 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1 / 3.1:1

Maximum drag20kg / 44.09lbs

Weight920g / 32.45oz

Line retireve per crank104cm / 56cm

Ball bearings6+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelMultireels
Price range~ €499.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size20II CAM
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeLever drag
Handle orientationRight
Line capacity monofil-

Conclusion

Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX edges out Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the total score (9.5 out of 10) and the ball bearings (6+1). Still, Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 280g / 9,88oz and a ergonomics of 6.07 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Shimano Talica 20II CAM?

Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX

With a score like 8.13 out of 10 (280g / 9,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.