Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX

Shimano Sahara FJ

Spinning

78.00 out of 100

Value for money3 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability7 out of 10

Ergonomics6.07 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs

Weight280g / 9.88oz

Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch

Ball bearings4+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €71.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000 XG
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Shimano Twin Power XD A

Spinning

95.00 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability9.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.33 out of 10

Gear ratio6.0:1

Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs

Weight200g / 7.05oz

Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch

Ball bearings11

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €359.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel sizeC 3000 HG
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210

Conclusion

Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX edges out Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (9.5 out of 10). Still, Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 4+1 and a line retrieve per crank of 99 centimeter / 38.98 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.