Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
78.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Shimano Cardiff 201A
Multireels
35.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/315. 0.25/255, 0.30/195 lb-yds: 8/230, 10/210, 14/120
Conclusion
Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 201A, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs). While Shimano Cardiff 201A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Shimano Cardiff 201A?
Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- A high retrieve rate of 9.4 out of 10 (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
