Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.
Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
47.70 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €189.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X clearly outshines Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X, offering significantly better performance in total score (9.5 out of 10) and gear ratio (4.7:1). While Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD?
Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Exceptional value at €189.00, this reel offers impressive performance for the price, making it a top pick for serious feeder and match anglers and pros
Similar comparisons
Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX
Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD
Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X
Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX
Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX
Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX
Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX
Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX
Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX
Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX
Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX
Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X
Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX
Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X
