Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
47.70 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X clearly outshines Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X, offering significantly better performance in total score (7.85 out of 10) and gear ratio (5.1:1). While Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Solid value at €189.33, reliable and great performance, it’s a smart choice for a variety of spinning fishing needs
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX
