Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sahara FJ

Spinning

47.70 out of 100

Value for money2 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability7 out of 10

Ergonomics6.07 out of 10

Gear ratio4.7:1

Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs

Weight280g / 9.88oz

Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch

Ball bearings4+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €71.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Shimano Stradic SWB

Seafishing

63.90 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability8.73 out of 10

Ergonomics5.76 out of 10

Gear ratio5.7:1

Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs

Weight450g / 15.87oz

Line retireve per crank103 centimeter / 40.55 inch

Ball bearings7

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSeafishing
Price range~ €219.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size6000HG
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/190

Conclusion

Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (8.73 out of 10) and total score (6.39 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Shimano Stradic SWB?

Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X

When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles