Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X and Daiwa Tanacom 500 perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X offers a weight of 240g / 8,47oz, while Daiwa Tanacom 500 stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Daiwa Tanacom 500?
Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX
