Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Delphin RAYA body
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Delphin RAYA body
Feeder And Match
44.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.63 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight584g / 20.6oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €75.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size55 Y
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/400
Conclusion
Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X clearly outshines Delphin RAYA body, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and line retrieve per crank (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch). While Delphin RAYA body may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Delphin RAYA body?
Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI
