Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
45.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank68cm / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.20mm/140m
Conclusion
Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and ball bearings (4+1). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Shimano Stradic FM vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Shimano Stradic FM


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX
