Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X and Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X offers a ball bearings of 4+1, while Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Penn 2020 Clash II?
Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX
