Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X and Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X offers a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs, while Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX
